The Criminal Court allowed the withdrawal of the application with liberty to file a revision against the framing of charges. The application was then dismissed.
Leave granted to withdraw application with liberty to file Revision challenging the order framing Charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 550 OF 2015
Ratansinh Parvatsinh Devada. ..Applicant. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.
Mr. Kartik Gara i/b Wasim Shaikh for the Applicant. Mrs. P. H. Kantharia, learned APP for the State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & R. G. KETKAR, JJ. Date : September 15, 2015 .
P. C. :
[R. G. KETKAR, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 2
patilsr
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment / Order.
2 / 2
patilsr
Ratansinh Parvatsinh Devada.
State of Maharashtra.
RANJIT MORE
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
