This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 apl422.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Criminal Application (APL) No. 422 of 2015
(Sau. Vijaya Manoj Binjade (maiden name) Ku. Vijaya D/o Tukaram Sonekar Vs. State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Khaparkheda, Tah. & Dist. Nagpur and anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri H. N. Bhondge, Advocate for the applicant Shri T. A. Mirza, APP for the State /non-applicant no. 1 Shri John Anthony, Advocate for non-applicant no. 2
CORAM : B. R. Gavai and P. B. Varale, JJ . DATE : 5-10-2015.
The applicant has approached this Court with a prayer for adding Sections 66C, 67, 67A of the Information Technology Act to the First Information Report.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions, states that Section 66(E) and Section 67(A) of the Information Technology Act have already been added to the First Information Report. In that view of the matter, criminal application is disposed of being served its purpose.
JUDGE JUDGE
wasnik
...../-
Vijaya Manoj Binjade
State of Maharashtra
non-applicant no. 2
B. R. Gavai
P. B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
