The High Court dismissed an appeal and a civil application as infructuous. The demolition of the suit premises by the respondent corporation prior to the hearing rendered the reliefs sought impossible to grant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
236.15-caf
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION.
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 184 OF 2015
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.236 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Ditendra Mishra for the Appellant Mr. Vinod Mahadik for Municipal Corporation
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 17, 2015
P.C.:
“(a) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this suit, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to restrain the Defendants, its servants, agents and/or any other person acting on its behalf by an order and injunction from demolishing
Basavraj G Patil
1/2
236.15-caf
and/or removing the suit premises i.e. suit premises admeasuring 20' x 40' ft. situated at Matang Samaj Mandir, Indira Nagar, Sainath Nagar Road, Ghatkopar (W), Mumbai – 400 086, the said premises is made up of iron frame and germane steel except due process of law;
(b) interim and ad-interim reliefs interms of prayer clause (a) hereinabove be granted.
(c) ...... (d) ...... (e) ......”
JUDGE
Basavraj G Patil
2/2
Basavraj G Patil
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
K. K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
