The High Court of Bombay disposed of a settlement reached out of court between the appellant and respondent no.4. The appeal was allowed in terms of consent terms, and the pending civil application was dismissed as infructuous.
Appeal disposed of in terms of Consent Terms; Civil Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pr8 ao132-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.132 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.168 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Ms.Poonam Gupta for the appellant
Mr.Saikumar Ramamurthy for the respondent no.4
CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 30/07/2015
PC :
1 Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the Appellant, matter is taken on board for urgent orders.
2 Advocate for the appellant submits that they are not pressing Appeal from Order against respondent nos.1, 2 and 3. Same is accepted. 3 Both the counsel state that matter is settled out of court. They tendered Consent Terms dated 30.7.2015 duly signed by the respective appellant and respondent no.4 and their advocates. The same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
4 Appeal from Order stands disposed of in terms of Consent Terms.
1/2
Mohite
pr8 ao132-15.doc
(K.K.TATED, J.)
2/2
Mohite
Appellant
Respondent no.4
K.K.TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
