Appellants sought to withdraw an appeal dismissing a temporary injunction application regarding a right of way and requested expedited hearing of the underlying suit.
The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The trial Court is mandated to decide the suit expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 10 OF 2015
MRS. JOANA PINTO BARRETTO AND 2 ORS., ... Appellants Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF GOA AND 23 ORS., ... Respondents
Shri Ryan Da Piedade Menezes, Advocate for the Appellants. Smt. Priyanka Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Smt. Anarkali Agni, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kalpa Govekar, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 18.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:10th July, 2015
P.C:
By this appeal, the appellants/plaintiffs are challenging the order dated 24.11.2014, by which the application for temporary injunction (Exhibit-21) was dismissed. The dispute pertains to a right of way. According to the appellants, the respondents were trying to obstruct the way, by erection of a gate/compound wall and thereafter, raising cement poles and barbed wire fencing.
AO/10/2015
2
temporary injunction operating. In such circumstances, Shri Menezes, leanred Counsel for the appellants, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal, with a request to expedite the hearing of the civil suit.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
EV
MRS. JOANA PINTO BARRETTO AND 2 ORS.
THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF GOA AND 23 ORS.
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
