Dismissed
Kusum a Jain v. Sitaram Pandurang Parte and Anr.
Bombay HCALP/474/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
7.ALP.474-13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION [ALP] NO.474 OF 2013
Smt. Kusum A. Jain Versus Shri Sitaram Pandurang Parte and another
..Applicant
..Respondents
None for the Applicant. Mrs. Anamika Malhotra, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 23rd JUNE, 2015
P.C.
respondent No.1 though on earlier date the respondent No.1 was represented by his lawyer. As none present for the
applicant/appellant in this application for leave to file appeal challenging the acquittal of the respondent No.1 in the matter of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution and disposed of.
Deshmane (PS)
1 / 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Kusum A. Jain
Shri Sitaram Pandurang Parte
A. R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court