Criminal Application for bail was allowed. The rule was made absolute in terms of a prior order dated 18th February, 2015. The applicant was released on ad interim bail.
Rule made absolute in terms of order dated 18th February, 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application [ABA] No. 74 of 2015 [Arunendra Pradeep Mishra Vs. State of Mah.]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. R.M. Daga, Adv., for the Applicant. Mr. Khan, APP for respondent.
CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATE : 18th June, 2015.
Heard learned counsel for the rival parties.
The applicant is already released on ad interim bail looking to the nature of the offence and the fact that the applicant is not recipient of the money, but is charged for fabrification of documents.
In this situation, I am inclined to pass the following order:-
2
Criminal Application No. 74 of 2015 is allowed.
Rule is made absolute in terms of the order dated 18th February, 2015 passed by this Court.
Judge
|hedau|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant the interim bail application regarding fabrication of documents where the applicant is not the recipient of money.
Arunendra Pradeep Mishra
State of Mah.
A.B. CHAUDHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
