High Court judge granted anticipatory bail by ordering the investigating officer to provide 72 hours prior notice to the applicant if any non-bailable charge, such as Section 354 IPC, is added to the initial bailable charges.
Direction to Investigating Officer to give 72 hours prior notice to applicant before adding non-bailable section to charges.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABA.1550.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1550 OF 2015
Himanshu Shekhar ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Subhash Jha with Ms. Rushita Jain i/b Law Global for the Applicant
Ms. Veera Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. WEDNESDAY, 21ST OCTOBER, 2015
P.C. :
who is present in Court, states that initially, the applicant was charged for the offences punishable under Section 354(D) and 509 of the Indian Penal Code, both of which, are bailable, however, now Section 354 has been added.
1/2
SQ Pathan
ABA.1550.15.doc
ORDER
the applicant in connection with C.R. No. I-178 of 2015 registered with the CBD Belapur Police Station.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
SQ Pathan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application should be disposed of upon direction to investigating officer to give 72 hours prior notice if non-bailable offence is added.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Himanshu Shekhar
State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
