The applicant sought to withdraw an anticipatory bail application. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn and disposed of the intervening application accordingly, without considering the matter on merits.
Application disposed of as withdrawn; intervention application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-aba.107.2015a.w148.format.doc
1/2
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.107 OF 2015
Suryakumar Deraiswami Shivsagaran ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.148 OF 2015 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.107 OF 2015
Nitin Nanasaheb Baraskar …Intervener
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Suryakumar Deraiswami Shivsagaran ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Pralhad D. Paranjape, for the Applicant
Ms. Veera Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State
Mr.A.H.H.Ponda, i/b Mr.M.P.Dalvi, for the Intervener.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE : 19th OCTOBER, 2015
25-aba.107.2015a.w148.format.doc
2/2
application.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Suryakumar Deraiswami Shivsagaran
State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
