Suit dismissed for default. The plaintiff appeared through no counsel, whereas the defendants were represented, leading to dismissal for want of prosecution.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
933-S-671-2013
Nitin
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 671 OF 2013
Nitin Parshuram Vichare … Plaintiff Versus District Collector Mumbai Suburban District and Ors. … Defendants
None for the Plaintiff. Ms. J.A. Pandhi a/w. Ms. S. Shah for Defendant Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2015
P.C.:
None for the Plaintiff. In view thereof, the Suit is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
