The High Court disposed of Suit No. 2176 of 2006 between Hemant Bhide and M/s. Godrej & Boyce in terms of a mutual consent settlement. Original documents were replaced with authenticated photocopies and the suit was closed.
Suit disposed of on consent terms; original documents replaced by authenticated photocopies; court fee refunded if applicable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-S2176-06.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 2176 OF 2006
Hemant Bhide…Plaintiff
Versus
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.…Defendant
Mr. R. Gajria, i/b M/s. Gajria & Co., for the Plaintiff.
Ms. A. Singhania, i/b Bachubhai Munim & Co., for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 30th October 2015
PC:-
1.The Suit is settled. Consent terms are tendered. These are
signed by the Plaintiff and Constituted Attorney on behalf of the
Defendant, as also by the parties’ respective Advocates. The
consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for
identification. The undertakings in the consent terms are accepted
as undertakings to the Court.
2.Parties are directed to take back the original documents
tendered by them in evidence. These are to be substituted with
photocopies duly authenticated by their respective Advocates.
1 of 2
902-S2176-06.DOC
3. The Suit is disposed of in accordance with the consent terms. Refund of Court fee, if any, in accordance with the Rules.
4. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court