The Bombay High Court allowed the withdrawal of Suit No. 1439 of 2006 based on consent terms filed in a related suit, recording the same as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Suit allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-S1439-06.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1439 OF 2006
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.…Plaintiff
Versus
Hemant Bhide…Defendant
Ms. A. Singhania, i/b Bachubhai Munim & Co., for the Plaintiff.
Mr. R. Gajria, i/b M/s. Gajria & Co., for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 30th October 2015
PC:-
1.In view of the consent terms filed in Suit No. 2176 of 2006
between the same parties and the order passed in accordance with
those consent terms, this Suit is allowed to be withdrawn with no
order as to costs.
2.Parties are directed to take back the original documents
tendered by them in evidence. These are to be substituted with
photocopies duly authenticated by their respective Advocates.
3.The Suit is disposed of as withdrawn. Refund of Court fee, if
any, in accordance with the Rules.
1 of 2
902-S1439-06.DOC
4. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.
Hemant Bhide
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court