Writ petition disposed of when respondent counsel sought withdrawal. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition, directing legal representatives to seek recourse in appropriate forums if available.
Writ petition withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp965.01
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 965 OF 2001
(Gopal Ramu Jangale, since deceased through LRs. & Anr. Vs. The
State of Maharashtra & Ors.)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE &
A.I.S. CHEEMA,JJ.
DATED : 04.09.2014
Mr.A.G. Talhar, Advocate for the
petitioners.
Mrs.M.S. Patni, AGP for respondent/
State.
1.Learned Counsel for the
petitioners seeks to withdraw the
petition. He may advise his client who
are legal representatives of original
petitioners to take recourse of law
before such forum as may be available.
The writ petition is disposed of as
withdrawn.
[A.I.S. CHEEMA,J.] [A.V. NIRGUDE,J.]
snk /2014/SEP14/wp965.01
Gopal Ramu Jangale (LRs)
State of Maharashtra
A.V. Nirgude
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court