Petitioner sought transfer of job for couple's convenience under Scheduled Tribe category. Court directed Respondent No. 2 to decide the proposal within five weeks.
Direction to Respondent No. 2 to decide transfer proposal under category couple convenience within five weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-8833-14
1/2
kambli
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8833 OF 2014
Somnath s/o Chindu Murhe ….Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.
Mr. Balaji Shinde i/b Ashwin R.Kapadnis for the Petitioner. Mr.V.N.Sagare, AGP for the State.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA &
A.A.SAYED, JJ. 1 OCTOBER 2014.
P.C. :
The Petitioner's proposal is pending since long, wherein the request is to consider the transfer issue being under the “couple convenience” from Scheduled Tribe Category.
wp-8833-14
2/2
kambli
(Anoop V. Mohta, J.)
( A.A.Sayed, J. )
Somnath s/o Chindu Murhe
State of Maharashtra
Anoop V. Mohta
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
