Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn; rule discharged; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 866 OF 2009
M/S JUTEX AND JUTEX TRADING THROUGH ITS PARTNER SHRI PARAG JOSHI Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS.,
... Petitioner
... Respondents
Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. Pai, Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:RANJIT MORE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:6th August, 2014
P.C.:-
Mr. H. D. Naik, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, having taken instructions from his client, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted.
The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs.
U. V. BAKRE, J. RANJIT MORE, J.
ssm.
M/S JUTEX AND JUTEX TRADING THROUGH ITS PARTNER SHRI PARAG JOSHI
STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS.
RANJIT MORE
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
