This is a writ petition challenging the dismissal of a temporary injunction application in a civil suit regarding land ownership and trees. The High Court found no prima facie case for interference and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition dismissed. No costs. The civil proceedings shall continue to be decided on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. 845.2014
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 845 OF 2014
Pradip Shridharrao Patil V/s Shivraj Limbraj Sangve & Ors.
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 29/01/2014
Mr. R.K.Ashtekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.N.Gaddime, Advocate for the Respondents.
COURT'S ORDER :
2 W.P. 845.2014
perspective. The Court has only relied on the 7/12 extract and has negatived the relief claimed by the petitioner. According to the learned counsel, the mutation entry of the said tamarind trees in favour of the respondents has been taken pursuant to the decree passed in R.C.S. No. 528 of 1989, to which the petitioner was not a party. The learned counsel submits that the said tamarind trees are in the land of the petitioner.
3 W.P. 845.2014
[ S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
KNP/W.P. 845.2014
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to interfere with the order dismissing the temporary injunction application.
Whether the閉塞品 of trees dispute and the mutation entry are sufficient to allow supervisory intervention.
Pradip Shridharrao Patil
Shivraj Limbraj Sangve & Ors.
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
