Shahida Khatoon Maulana Maqsood and 15 Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP827.10.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 827 OF 2010
vs
… Respondents
Mr. Atul G. Damle for the Petitioners.
Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Govt. Pleader, for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5 - State.
Ms. K.H. Mastakar for the Respondent No.2 - BMC.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR &
A.K. MENON, JJ.
MONDAY, 09TH JUNE, 2014.
P.C. :
SRP 1/2
WP827.10.doc
respondents have, in fact, by their affidavit dated 5th July, 2011, expressly stated that alternate accommodation will be given to the eligible affected hutments at suitable places as per the prevailing rules and regulations. No other reliefs have been pressed for. Needless to add that the petitioners are always at liberty to challenge any decision that may be taken in accordance with law.
2. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
A.K. MENON, J. S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
2/2
SRP
Shahida Khatoon w/o Maulana Maqsood & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
S.J. Vazifdar
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court