report dated 29/11/2012 was submitted. Consequent to that, a show cause notice dated 12/02/2013 was issued by the respondent no. 4, under Section 71 of the Act, to the petitioners as to why the Administrator or Committee of Administrator should not be appointed to manage the affairs of the society. A misfeasance report dated 19/04/2013 was also prepared by the respondent no. 5 pursuant to the said authorization order dated 10/10/2012. On the basis of the inquiry report and misfeasance report, on 31/05/2013, a notice was issued by the respondent no. 3 to the petitioners in the exercise of power under Section 82 of the Act. Without providing the report to the petitioners, the respondent no. 3 ordered issuance of Summons dated 18/7/2013, through the respondent no. 2. The petitioners filed a Writ Petition No. 490/2013 alleging that the respondent no. 3 had no provided to the petitioners the reports and that the reply filed by the petitioners to the show cause notice was not considered. By order dated 16/08/2013, this Court disposed of the said Writ Petition and granted liberty to the petitioners to file an additional reply and also an application to drop the proceedings and directed the respondent no. 3 to consider the same in accordance with law. Thereafter, on 30/08/2013, the petitioners filed their additional reply before the respondent no. 3 and an application dated 30/08/2013 to drop the proceedings. By order dated 15/11/2013, the said application filed by the petitioners for dropping the proceedings was dismissed by the respondent no. 3.
