The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad, Bombay Bench, disposed of the writ petition after the respondent's Advocate General informed that the matter pending under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act would be concluded within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp672614.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6726 OF 2014
Vishanu s/o Ramrao Jivrag
Petitioner
Versus
Pandurang s/o Ramrao Jivrag and another
Respondents
Mr.Annasaheb S. Kadam, advocate for the petitioner Mr.K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE :14th August, 2014
PER COURT:
Learned A.G.P., on instructions from the Tahsildar, informs that the pending matter, presented under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, would be disposed of within three months from today.
In view of the statement made by the learned A.G.P., nothing survives for consideration in the petition.
Writ Petition stands disposed of.
V.L.ACHLIYA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb/wp672614
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishanu s/o Ramrao Jivrag
Pandurang s/o Ramrao Jivrag
V.L.Achliya
R.M.Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
