The Court called upon the Central Board of Excise & Customs to expedite a pending representation by the petitioner regarding divergent valuation views by Excise Commissioners, to be decided within four weeks without examining merits.
The Central Board of Excise & Customs was called upon to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
kambli
wpl-123-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.123 OF 2014
INOX Air Products Ltd. ...Petitioner v/s.
Union of India & ors.
...Respondents
Mr.N.S.Thakkar i/b Economic Laws Practice for the petitioner. Mr.Pradeep S. Jetly for respondent-UoI.
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S.SANKLECHA, J. DATE : 21 FEBRUARY 2014
P.C.:
In view of divergent views being taken by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem and the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bokaro, in respect of proper valuation of the petitioner's goods, the petitioner had made representation dated 23 April 2013 to the Central Board of Excise & Customs (Exh.K) pointing out the different views of the Excise authorities in different jurisdictions, and seeking a clarification so as to ensure uniformity.
1 of 2
kambli 2
wpl-123-14
Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance to issue necessary clarification. Since the petitioner has not received any response to the above representation, the petitioner has moved this Court.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
INOX Air Products Ltd.
Union of India
MOHIT S. SHAH
M.S. SANKLECHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
