Writ petition challenging merit list for pension selection rendered infructuous as respondent selected for employment remained undiserved from notice. Remedies kept open for petitioner.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to non-service of notice on selected candidate; remedies kept open for petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
583
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
WRIT PETITION NO. 583 OF 2011
UMADEVI RAMCHANDRA GIRI
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH PETROLEUM SECRETARY AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Naiknavare Ramesh V. Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3: Mrs. Anjali Dubey. ***
CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A. M. BADAR, JJ. DATED: 12th NOVEMBER, 2014.
PER COURT:
Nos.2 and 3 on 7th April, 2014. Selected candidate viz. Respondent no.4 was not served. This Court passed a conditional order on 31st January, 2014. As no steps were taken, accordingly petition has been dismissed as against Respondent No.4.
-:(2):-
583
[A. M. BADAR, J.] [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dt.12/11/2014 ans/583
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow challenge to merit list where selected candidate was not served with notice.
Whether petition becomes infructuous without service on all interested parties.
Umadevi Ramchandra Giri
Union of India Through Petroleum Secretary and Ors
B.P.Dharmadikari
A.M.Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
