Allowed

Shri. Sanjay S/O Suresh Joshi v. Shri. Sudhakar S/O Dinkar Paranjape and Another

Bombay HC19 Nov 2014WP/545/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court bench quashed proceedings in Criminal Complaint Case No.1570/2008 for offences under IPC Sections 420, 468, and 34, accepting joint petitions and a plea of amicable resolution between the petitioner-accused and the respondent-complainant, resulting in the disposal of two criminal writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in Criminal Complaint Case No.1570/2008 quashed. Bail bonds of petitioners cancelled.

Shri. Sanjay S/O Suresh Joshi Vs Shri. Sudhakar S/O… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

1 wp544,545.14

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

¶3

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.544 OF 2014

¶4

(Mahesh s/o Sharad Dande ..vs.. Sudhakar s/o Dinkar Paranjape and another)

¶5

WITH

¶6

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.545 OF 2014

¶7

(Sanjay s/o Suresh Joshi ..vs.. Sudhakar s/o Dinkar Paranjape and another)

¶8

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶9

- - - - Shri R.R. Vyas, Advocate for the petitioners,

¶10

Shri A.M. Jaltare, Advocate for respondent No.1, Shri A.H. Laddhad, Addl.P.P. for respondent No.2/State.

¶11

CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 19-11-2014

¶12

The petitioners in both the petitions are accused in Criminal Complaint Case No.1570/2008 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 468 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Both the writ petitions challenge the order of issuance of process against the petitioners. However, during the pendency of these writ petitions, the dispute between the petitioners and respondent No.1 Sudhakar Paranjape has been amicably resolved. Respondent No.2 State of Maharashtra is a formal party as the complaint pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate is a private complaint filed by respondent No.1.

¶13

Two joint pursis have been filed by the petitioners and respondent No.1 Sudhakar Paranjape in both the petitions. In view of the amicable resolution of the dispute between the parties, it is just and proper to quash the

¶14

2 wp544,545.14

¶15

proceedings pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. In fact, it is the joint prayer of both the parties. Hence, I pass the following order.

¶16

The proceedings pending vide Criminal Complaint Case No.1570/2008 against both the petitioners in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur shall stand quashed.

¶17

Bail bonds of the petitioners, if any, shall stand

¶18

cancelled.

¶19

Both the joint pursis be taken on record and one of each them shall be placed on each of the petition and be marked as “A” for identification

¶20

Both the petitions are disposed of accordingly.

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

pma

Shri. Sanjay S/O Suresh Joshi v. Shri. Sudhakar S/O Dinkar Paranjape and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Sanjay S/O Suresh Joshi v. Shri. Sudhakar S/O Dinkar Paranjape and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramniwas S/O Chaganmal Mundra, Prop. of M/S Mundra Plywoods Thr. His Poa Mr Mundra Vs Lochan Zilpe and Anr.

Shobha W/O Avinash Salkar Vs Avinash S/O Manoharrao Salkar and Another

Thoraj S/O Narayan Avthare Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Range Forest Officer, F.P.S. and A.W.P. Allapalli, Gadchiroli

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shri. Mahesh S/O Sharad Dande Vs Shri. Sudhakar S/O Dinkar Paranjape and Another

Tahira Hafizulla Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.