Petitioner withdrew the writ petition stating grievance redressed. Court allowed withdrawal and disposed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5099-14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION No. 5099 of 2014 Roshani d/o Purushottam Pakhamode
vrs.
State of Mah. And others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri Harshal Bobde, counsel for petitioners.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND P.R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER , 2014 .
Heard.
Shri Bobade, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and the petitioner is, therefore, not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition.
The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
Roshani d/o Purushottam Pakhamode
State of Mah.
VASANTI A. NAIK
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
