Disposed
Rohidas Govind Shenoy v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/4978/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-4978.11
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4978 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri V.V. Pai i/by Ms. Shubhangi Vaidya for the Petitioner. Smt. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ DATED : 4TH JULY 2014
P.C.:
. The entire cause of action for filing this
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has arisen in Mumbai. Hence, we transfer this Petition to the Original Side of this Court. Consequential amendment shall be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.
Petitioner
Respondent No.1
A.S. OKA
A.S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court