Dismissed
Parveen Begum Abdul Rasheed v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/4770/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
sr.915.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
4770.11 sr.915.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4770 OF 2011
Parveen Begum w/o. Abdul Rasheed
Petitioner/s
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondent/s
Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, GP for the Respondent
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.
DATE : 7TH FEBRUARY, 2014.
PER COURT:
1]Petitioner and advocate, both, are absent,
though their name has been correctly displayed on the
Board.
2]Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for
want of prosecution.
[RAVINDRA V. GHUGE][S.C. DHARMADHIKARI]
JUDGEJUDGE.
grt/-
Parveen Begum w/o. Abdul Rasheed
State of Maharashtra and others
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court