In a criminal writ petition objecting to an A Summary, the Bench directed the investigating agency to file appropriate reports within four weeks. The matter has been disposed of accordingly.
Direction to Magistrate to pass appropriate orders regarding A Summary within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01042014criwpno.467.2013 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Criminal Writ Petition No. 467 of 2013
Manoj Ghanshyamdas Rathi vs. State of Maharashtra and others.
Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Shri R.B.Dhore, Adv. for the petitioner. Shri M.K.Pathan, APP for respondents.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & C.V.BHADANG,JJ DATE : 01.04.2014
This Court had adjourned the matter on 2.12.2013 so as
to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to seek instructions as to whether any objection was raised by the petitioner to the “A Summary” filed by the investigating agency.
Shri Dhore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the protest petition has been filed by the petitioner objecting “A Summary”. However, the learned Magistrate has yet to pass order.
We, therefore, direct the learned Magistrate to pass appropriate orders regarding “A Summary” and as to whether the objection raised by the petitioner needs to be granted or not after
01042014criwpno.467.2013 2
giving an opportunity to the concerned parties within the period of four weeks. The petitioner is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
patle
Manoj Ghanshyamdas Rathi
State of Maharashtra
others
B.R. Gavai
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
