Dismissed
Bharti Kashinath Patil v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/4605/2001
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
4605.01..sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
G.A.Ghule [P.A.]
1/1
wp 4605.01..sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Writ Petition No.4605 Of 2001.
Bharati Kashinath Patil :: Petitioner.
V e r s u s
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. :: Respondents.
Appearance =>
Mr. Ajinkya Kale, Advocate h/for Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mrs. S.D. Shelke, A.G.P. for the State of Maharashtra.
Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : A.V. Nirgude & A.I.S. Cheema, JJ. DATE : 13th October, 2014.
Per Court :-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that, petition due to passage of time has become infructuous. Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
(A.I.S. Cheema, J.) (A.V. Nirgude, J.)
Bharati Kashinath Patil
The State of Maharashtra
A.V. Nirgude
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court