Petitioner sought similar relief granted in another writ petition. Court directed respondents to decide representations within four months referencing Government Circular dated 24 April 2007.
Direction to respondents to decide representations within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
918.4381.14 wp.sxw
ism 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4381 OF 2014
Virsing Bhamata Pawara and others vs The State of Maharashtra and ors
.... Petitioners
.... Respondents
Mr. V. S. Tadke for the petitioner. Mrs. S.S. Bhende, AGP for respondent/State.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : April 23, 2014
P.C.:
Rule, returnable forthwith.
2 Learned Asstt. Government Pleader waives service for
the respective Respondents.
3 Learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that this Court by order dated 06 January 2014 passed in Writ Petition no.33 of 2014 has already directed the concerned Respondent no.3 to decide such representations. The same relief can be granted/extended to the Petitioners as they are similarly circumstanced and their grievances are also identical based on the Government Circular dated 24 April 2007. Therefore, we are inclined to dispose of the present petition on similar lines. Therefore, service to other Respondents is dispensed with. The
1/2
918.4381.14 wp.sxw
ism 2
Petition is taken up for final disposal forthwith.
4 Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned Respondents to consider the representation/s made by the Petitioner in the light of Government Circular dated 24 April 2007 and order dated 29 October 2013 passed by this Court in Writ Petition no.10200 of 2013 and also in the light of the observations made in judgment dated 24 April 2012 in Writ Petition no.716 of 201 passed by this Court at Aurangabad Bench, as referred in the orders of this Court. Similar order was passed in Writ Petition no.2077 of 2013 on 03 July 2013 also.
5 The representation/s should be decided as early as possible and preferably within a period of four months from today. 6 Rule is made absolute in the above terms. There shall
be no order as to costs.
(M. S. SONAK, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners can avail of the same relief granted in a similar writ petition on similar grounds?
Virsing Bhamata Pawara and others
The State of Maharashtra and ors
Anoop V. Mohta
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
