This single-paragraph short order directs the Collector, Nanded, to decide a compassionate ground appointment proposal within thirty days in light of recommendations by the Executive Engineer, after which the petition stands disposed of.
Direction to decide the representation on or before 15.6.2014; Petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4211.13
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4211 OF 2013
RUPESH SAKHARAJI TATE AND ANR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Adv. for Petitioners : Shri P.V. Mandlik, senior counsel i/b Mr. Gandhi A. S. AGP for Respondents: Mrs. V.A. Shinde
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED: 17th APRIL, 2014
P.C. :-
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the proposal for appointment of petitioner No.1 on compassionate ground is already recommended by the Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Nanded to the District Collector. We direct the Collector, Nanded to decide the representation of the petitioner, if already not decided, keeping in view the recommendation made by the Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Nanded. The said representation to be decided as expeditiously as possible, however, on or before 15.6.2014. Petition stands disposed of.
( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. S. SHINDE, J. )
rlj/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Collector, Nanded should decide the compassionate ground appointment proposal within a prescribed deadline.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rupesh Sakharaji Tate and Anr
The State of Maharashtra and Ors
S. S. Shinde
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
