This judgment disposes of a writ petition regarding a cooperative society dispute by accepting a settlement agreement tendered as pursis between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4087-11
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No.4087 OF 2011
Ku. Rukhmini G. Gutte.
Vrs.
The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Miss A.S. Athalye, counsel for the petitioner. Miss Tajwar Khan, AGP for respondent no. 1. Shri Samarth, counsel for respondent no2.
The learned counsel for the parties have tendered a pursis in the court today. The same is accepted on record.
The pursis is signed by the petitioner and the Secretary of the respondent no. 2 society. The pursis is also signed by the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the respondent society.
We have perused the contents of the pursis and the terms on which the petitioner and the respondent no.2 management are settling the dispute. The terms appear to be just and reasonable.
The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the settlement pursis dated 21.7.2014. There would be no order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Hirekhan
Ku. Rukhmini G. Gutte
The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project
Hirekhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
