The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad, Bombay, disposed of a writ petition by directing the District Rehabilitation Officer to decide the petitioner's representation within four months and following the law.
Direction to take a decision on the representation as expeditiously as possible and preferably within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
3770.14 wp.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3770 OF 2014
Maruti Kundlik Veer
Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondent/s
Mr. S.B. Thatol Patil,advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for the Respondent
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2014.
PER COURT:
1]This petition can be disposed of by issuing
direction to the District Rehabilitation Officer to
take decision on the representation of the petitioner
dated 14th May, 2013, as expeditiously as possible and
preferably within a period of 4 months from today, in
accordance with law and it is directed accordingly.
2]With the direction as aforesaid, writ
petition stands disposed of.
[A.M. BADAR][R.M. BORDE]
JUDGEJUDGE.
grt/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of by directing the District Rehabilitation Officer to decide on the petitioner's representation expeditiously.
Maruti Kundlik Veer
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court