Disposed

Shri. Vaibhav Dipak Sable v. the State of Maharashtra, through Divisional Revenue Commissioner and Ors.

Bombay HC28 Oct 2014WP/3386/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the writ petition regarding the removal of the petitioner as Sarpanch without examining merits, as the impugned order remained effective, keeping all substantive issues open for future consideration.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of without determination of merits; all issues regarding the order of 12 September 2014 remain open.

Shri. Vaibhav Dipak Sable Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2014)

wp3386

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.3386 OF 2014

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the Petitioner
Mr.S.N.Patil, AGP for the Respondent No.1.
Mr.G.S.Hiranandani i/b Mr.C.G.Gavnekar for respondent
No.2

¶9

Mr.G.S.Godbole i/b Mr.Nitin Mulye for respondent No.3
Mr.P.M.Patil for respondent No.4

¶10

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.S.GADKARI,JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 28,2014.

¶11

P.C.

¶12

1On 12th September 2014, an order has
beenpassedbytheDivisional
Commissioner, Konkan Division, Navi
Mumbai in exercise of power under sub-
section (1) of section 39 of the
Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act,1958
by which Shri Anand Shivram Yadav has
been ordered to be removed from the
post of Sarpanch and as a Member of
Village Panchayat Mangaon. A copy of
the said order is placed on record. In
view of the said order, nothing
survives in this petition and the same

¶13

wp3386

¶14

¶15

is disposed of.

¶16

2We make it clear that all issues on
merits of the order dated 12th September
2014 are kept open.

¶17

(A.S.GADKARI,J)

¶18

(A.S.OKA,J.)

Shri. Vaibhav Dipak Sable v. the State of Maharashtra, through Divisional Revenue Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Vaibhav Dipak Sable v. the State of Maharashtra, through Divisional Revenue Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudarshan Udyog Samuh, through Prop. Ranjeet Janardan Desai Vs the Estate Officer, Mahanagapalika, Kolhapur and Ors.

Smt. Nalini Chandrakant Koli (Bendkoli) Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Vijay Shankar Mulekar Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Raigad

Shri. Vijay Gunga Patil Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Dinanath Rajaram Ballal Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Balasaheb Sitaram Auti Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.