Writ petition challenging the Family Court's order rejecting an application to examine two witnesses. The Court upheld the Family Court's finding that the evidence was unnecessary repetition.
Writ Petition dismissed; Family Court's order upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.WP3311_2014doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3311 OF 2014
Suresh Bhujanga Bhandary … Petitioner
vs.
Sushma Bhandary … Respondent
Ms. Vijaya Mishra-Ingale, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Rina H. Pujara, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 24th September, 2014.
P.C.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.
1 of 2
903.WP3311_2014doc
petition on the ground of cruelty.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Family Court's rejection of the husband's application to examine two witnesses regarding alleged cruelty.
Suresh Bhujanga Bhandary
Sushma Bhandary
Mridula Bhaktaar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
