This court rejected a Criminal Writ Petition filed seeking release on parole for the petitioner on the grounds of his son's serious ailment, due to the absence of documentary evidence substantiating the claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0505wp326.14
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.326 OF 2014
(Shivkumar @ Chiku Lakhanlal Yadav vs. Divisional Commissioner and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri M.N. Ali, Advocate for petitioner.
Smt. S. Jachak, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents.
---------- CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATED : MAY 5, 2014
The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by rejection of his application for parole.
We find that the petitioner has sought his release on parole on the ground that his son is suffering from serious ailment. However, no document substantiating the said claim has been placed on record.
In that view of the matter, we are not
0505wp326.14
2/2
inclined to entertain the criminal writ petition. The criminal writ petition is, therefore, rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Writ Petition for release on parole should be entertained given the lack of documentary support for the petitioner's claim regarding his ailing son?
Shivkumar @ Chiku Lakhanlal Yadav
Divisional Commissioner
B.R. Gavai
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
