In this writ petition, the petitioner, a woman seeking a caste validity certificate, voluntarily withdrew her petition after Sakal Lal vs. Union of India pending before SC. The court disposed of the matter as not pressed. No relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-3136.13
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3136 OF 2013
Apasara Zakeer Pathan
… Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. R.K. Mendadkar i/by Mr. Vikas Kolekar, for Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4. Mr. Ravindra Panchudkar i/by Mr. Dilip Bodake, for Respondent No.3. Mr. Vikram R. Chavan, for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 5th MARCH, 2014
P.C.
. In Writ Petition No.2095 of 2012 filed by the Petitioner, the order granting caste validity certificate to the fifth Respondent has been set aside and Special Leave Petition preferred by the fifth Respondent against the said order is pending before the Apex Court. In view of this position, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that he will not press the Petition. The Petition is therefore disposed of as not pressed.
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of when the petitioner has voluntarily withdrawn the petition.
Apasara Zakeer Pathan
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
