Petitioners requested leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave and disposed of the petition.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 309 OF 2010
SHRI. SUBHASH WAGLEKAR AND 2 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus CHAIRMAN, KADAMBA TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND 14 ORS., ... Respondents
Petitioners no. 1 and 3 present in person. Ms. P. Sawant, Additional Government Advocate for respondent no. 3.
Coram:RANJIT MORE &
U. V. BAKRE, JJ.
Date:5th August, 2014
P.C.
Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 are present in person. They state that petitioner no. 2 has expired in 2012. They state that they do not want to prosecute the petition and seek leave to withdraw the petition.
U. V. BAKRE, J. RANJIT MORE, J.
SMA
Shri. Subhash Waglekar and 2 Ors.
Chairman, Kadamba Transport Corporation and 14 Ors.
U. V. Bakre
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
