Madakini Bala Gadekar v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an advertisement, noting the appointment has already been made, and left points open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 2997.12wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2997 OF 2012
MADAKINI BALA GADEKAR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Gandhi Amol S. AGP for Respondents: Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil. Advocate Mr. Deelip Bankar Patil,for R/3.
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, &
V.K. JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 22 nd APRIL, 2014
PER COURT :
. This petition takes exception to the advertisement dated 30/07/2011. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents informs this Court that, advertisement is already acted upon and appointments are given. In that view of the matter, leaving points open raised in this petition, the petition stands disposed of.
[ V.K. JADHAV, J.] [ S.S. SHINDE, J.]
Tupe/22.4.14
MADAKINI BALA GADEKAR
THE STATE OF MAH
S.S. SHINDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court