Writ petitions challenging the election of Managing Committee members of Agriculture Produce Market Committee became infructuous as their term ended in 2014 without substantive proceedings. Petitions were disposed of by keeping questions open.
Petitions kept open for consideration and disposed of; Rule discharged. No orders on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp 2937.09 & 2946.09
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2937 OF 2009
Suresh S/o Shamrao Patil & Pundlik S/o Vithoba Patil VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2946 OF 2009
..Madhukar Galu Mahajan. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.R.L. Kute AGP for Respondents:Mr. A.V.Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Vijay Patil Advocate for respondent No.5: Mrs. Patil
CORAM : R. M. BORDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2014
P.C. :-
Rule discharged. No costs.
( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd/11.9.14
Suresh S/o Shamrao Patil
Pundlik S/o Vithoba Patil
Madhukar Galu Mahajan
The State Of Maharashtra
R. M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
