Writ petition disposed of by keeping rights and contentions of parties expressly open due to a subsequent order passed by the first Respondent that rendered the prayers in the petition unviable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-2733.14
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2733 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Tushar Narayan Sonawane for the Petitioners. Shri Murlidhar Laxman Patil for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri Vijay S. Gharat i/by Shri Satyajeet H. Joshi for Respondent No.3. Smt. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S.GADKARI, JJ DATED : 3RD NOVEMBER 2014
P.C.:
. Learned counsel appearing for the first and second
Respondents has placed on record an order dated 1st November 2014 passed by the first Respondent. A copy of the said order is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. In view of the said order, the prayers made in the Petition will not survive as of today. The Petition is, accordingly, disposed of by keeping the rights
and contentions of all the parties expressly open.
(A.S.GADKARI, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
Petitioners
Respondents 1 and 2
Respondent No.3
Respondent No.4
A.S. OKA
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court