The High Court directed respondents to decide on petitioner’s representations on specified dates within three months and disposed of the writ petition.
Direct respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to take decision on petitioner’s representations on specified dates within three months from the date of order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
2727.14 wp.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2727 OF 2014
Marotirao Tatyaba Sarpate
Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondent/s
Smt. Anjali Bajpai Dube, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for the Respondents 1 to 3.
Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.4.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 2ND APRIL, 2014.
PER COURT:
1]This petition can be disposed of, by
directing the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to take decision
on the representations, tendered by the petitioner, on
6.7.2011, 9.1.2013, 17.1.2013, 29.12.2013 and
17.2.2014, as expeditiously as possible and preferably
within 3 months from today, and it is accordingly
directed.
2]Writ petition stands disposed of.
[A.M. BADAR][R.M. BORDE]
JUDGEJUDGE.
grt/-
Marotirao Tatyaba Sarpate
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court