The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition involving contractual disputes between petitioners and a respondent officer by dismissing the petition, holding that appropriate proceedings are available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2548-12
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2548 OF 2012
Anil B. Joshi & Anr. V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioners
...Respondents
Mr.Surel Shah i/b Mr.Rohit Shetty for the Petitioners. Mr.D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for the State – Respondent No1.
Mr.G.S. Hegde for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR &
A.K. MENON, JJ. DATE : 11TH JUNE, 2014.
P.C. :-
(A.K. MENON, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
1/1
Anil B. Joshi & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
S.J. VAZIFDAR
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
