entered between the private parties. It is further rightly submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that while granting approval, the education authorities need to consider whether the person, for whose appointment an approval is sought, is legally appointed or not and whether the procedure required for his appointment was followed by the management or not. There are several aspects, which need to be considered by the education authorities while considering the proposal of the management in respect of the appointment of an employee on a teaching or non-teaching post. In the instant case, the management had disputed in the written statement filed by them before the School Tribunal that the petitioner was legally appointed. On a consideration of the appointment order of the petitioner, dated 22/12/2000 and on a consideration of the fact that the petitioner had not worked with the respondent no.5 from 01/07/1994 till 22/12/2000, the Deputy Director rightly declined to grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Junior College Lecturer with effect from 01/07/1994. Admittedly, the petitioner was not a qualified teacher even on the date of his termination on 01/07/1994. In the facts of the case, we find no infirmity with the order of the Director of Education or for that matter, the order of the Deputy Director of Education declining to grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Junior College
