In this writ petition, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition as an FIR had been registered against the accused. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition without further adjudication.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and dispersed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
WP/2377/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2377 OF 2014
Mrs. Zainab Alim Akhtar Hublikar
….. Petitioner.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra
….... Respondent.
Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Petitioner. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE & P.D. KODE JJ.
DATE: 6th August, 2014
P.C.:-
The leaned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that since the FIR has now been registered against the accused, grievance of the Petitioner does not survive. Hence, the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
(P.D. KODE, J. ) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
BDPPS
Mrs. Zainab Alim Akhtar Hublikar
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
