Disposed
Deelip Madhavrao Kadam v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2280/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
wp.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
2280.11 wp.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2280 OF 2011
Deelip Madhavrao Kadam
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others...Respondents.
Mr. E.G. Irale Patil, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, GP for respondents.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.
DATE : 20TH FEBRUARY, 2014.
PER COURT:
1]Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits
that by passage of time, the challenge in the petition
is rendered infructuous.
2]Writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[RAVINDRA V. GHUGE][S.C. DHARMADHIKARI]
JUDGEJUDGE.
grt/-
Deelip Madhavrao Kadam
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court