The High Court at Nagpur disposed of a criminal writ petition as rendered infructuous without a substantive order or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2003cwp224.14.odt
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 224 OF 2014
(Rajendra Vithhal Gaikwad Vs. T he Collector/District Magistrate, Yavatmal & others)
Shri H. D. Dangre, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND C. V. BHADANG, JJ. DATED : 20th MARCH, 2014
The petition being rendered infructuous, stands disposed of as such.
JUDGE JUDGE
wwl
Rajendra Vithhal Gaikwad
Collector/District Magistrate, Yavatmal
B. R. GAVAI
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
