The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a declaration on school running permissions. The petitioner was non-appearance. The Court noted the permission granted to Respondent No.4 was valid and the school had run continuously. Having granted no interim relief, the Writ Petition was dismissed with costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2128 OF 2002
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
andRegistrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the
State.
Mr.S.G.Dudrawar, advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & N.W.SAMBRE, JJ. Date : 29.04.2014.
PER COURT :
of the petitioner at the time of admission of the petition.
2
discharged. No costs.
(N.W.SAMBRE,J.)(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.29.04.2014. asp/office/wp2128.02
3
Petitioner
Respondent No.4
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
N.W.SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court