13] Insofar as charge pertaining to the members of the Managing Committee acting in defiance with the Resolution of the General Body is concerned, the show cause notice is indeed blissfully vague. If the drastic action of supersession was in contemplation, then compliance with principles of natural justice and fair play is necessary. May be, that such principles are not rigid or required to be placed in straitjacket. However, it is imperative that the Members of the Managing Committee are acquainted with the precise charge against them, so that they are in a position to submit an effective response. In the present case, the show cause notice makes no reference to the particular Resolutions of the General Body, which the members of the Managing Committee can be said to have defied. This was necessary, particularly in the context of the petitioners defence that there were no Resolution of the General Body, which required Managing Committee to accept the decisions of the Repair Sub Committee as being the final word in the matter of appointment of Contractors for effecting repairs to the building. It was the defence of the members of the Managing Committee that the General Body had merely constituted a Repair Sub Committee either to advise the Managing Committee or the General Body itself, in the matter of selection of Contractors. However, neither the powers of Managing Committee nor the powers of General Body, in the matters of appointment of such Contractor had been delegated to such Repair Sub Committee. It was the case of the members of Managing Committee that this could never have been done, even in terms of the law.
