Writ petition filed by the petitioner against Respondent No. 1 and others was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear and the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
WP/1891/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1891 OF 2013
Nakshatra Co-operative Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Through its Hon. Secretary Shri Sachin Dattaram Temker
…... Petitioner.
V/s
Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Others
…... Respondents.
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. B.V. Phadnis i/b Uttangale & Co. for Respondent No.1. Mr. V.S. Paradkar for Respondent No.3. Ms. Prabha Badadare for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE & P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATE: 12th September, 2014
P.C.:-
None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. It does appear that by efflux of time, this Petition has become infructuous and, therefore, Petitioner is not keen in pursuing this Petition. Petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
(P.D. KODE, J. ) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
BDPPS
Nakshatra Co-operative Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Through its Hon. Secretary Shri Sachin Dattaram Temker
Slum Rehabilitation Authority
V. M. Kanade
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
