Madhav Ramrao Shinde v. Kamal Madhav Shinde and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 170 OF 2001
(Madhav s/o. Ramrao Shinde Vs. Kamal w/o. Madhav Shinde and Ors.)
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
| Mr. Amol Patale h/f. Mr. H.V. Patil, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. B.L. Dhus, APP for State. Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. |
|
| CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 15th December, 2014. |
|
| PER COURT : | |
| 1. The learned counsel for petitioner submitted | |
| that parties have settled the dispute out of the Court | |
| amicably and the matter has become infructuous. The statement was made on instruction. So, disposed of as infructuous. |
|
| [ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ] ssc/ |
Madhav s/o. Ramrao Shinde
Kamal w/o. Madhav Shinde and Ors.
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court