This affidavit-filing order disposed of a writ petition as the respondent assured withdrawal of the foundational application, rendering no further consideration necessary.
Petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
19 WRIT PETITION NO. 1697 OF 2014
RAOSEHEB PATWARDHAN NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD. AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. R. R. Karpe AGP for Respondents: Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi Advocate for Respondent 4 : Mr. A. C. Darandale ...
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: August 22, 2014 ... PER COURT :
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. ) … dyb
RAOSEHEB PATWARDHAN NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD. AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
